?

Log in

Entries Friends Calendar User Info My Website Previous Previous Next Next
A Tale in the Form of a Play for Your Amusement (but mostly for posterity) - The Frumious Random
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
megarandom
megarandom
A Tale in the Form of a Play for Your Amusement (but mostly for posterity)
Players:
Martin Cox as the jovial, loveable, and perspicacious (if confrontational) Martin Cox
Adrian Altimirano (alias Hadrian Wolfe *snicker*) as John Dashwood, the brain-damaged neo-nazi and self-hating human of Costa Rican descent.
The conversation for my reference: http://www.facebook.com/messages/john.dashwood.5


Please note that a lot of these messages were in response to posts I made on Face Book. He didn't want to post in a comment, ostensibly because he doesn't like threads. Or something

Another Note: He originally introduced me to Erin because his brother, David, at one point was mooning over her pretty hard core. She got to Statesboro shortly after I left for the Army. David found out that I was going to visit and tried to "warn" her that I was a conniving ladies' man with no scruples, that I would fuck anything that moves, and that she was my type. Turns out that he was right about the type! But anyway, Adrian's plan was to have us post imaginative Facebook entries to imply that we had hooked up so as to get his brother's goat and make him miserable. This also seems to be one of his goals in life. His little plan backfired when we started talking, comparing notes, and generally getting on like a house on fire. We additionally discovered through mutual research that these two had been talking mad smack about me in so many ways and I dropped him like a hot brick after that last exchange. An aspect of said talking of smack was that they would modify tales of our experiences together to cast me as the dumb-ass, the bad guy, or whatever negative role they could concoct, when they were the ones cast in those roles in the original events. One thing that offended her most was that these people had no reasons to make up any lies about me other than just pure hatefulness because it was very unlikely that we would meet. I think you will see the fun part of that story with that in mind.


John Dashwood
21 January 2011
Yo Dude.
Hey it's the guy that suggested talking to Erin. Wink, wink!

Martin Cox
21 January 2011
This isn't the wall, dude. This is a private message. [:P]

John Dashwood
22 January 2011
Private is good!

John Dashwood
24 March 2011
http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs005a.html

John Dashwood
24 March 2011
http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs005b.html

Martin Cox
24 March 2011
Tell me honestly why you couldn't post that as a response to my thread.

John Dashwood
24 March 2011
I don't like the threads. One of my quirks.

Martin Cox
24 March 2011
But you posted a failed rebuttal there with no problem...

John Dashwood
24 March 2011
A failed rebuttal? It's all a matter of opinion.
Not whose right or whose wrong.

Martin Cox
24 March 2011
When one says one can prove something, one is saying that one has right information. I have to say that even posting a link from that particular site makes one lose all credibility in many areas of "rightness"...

John Dashwood
24 March 2011
Perhaps you should read it first before making such a sweeping judgement?

Martin Cox
24 March 2011
I skimmed through it, but the wording reminded me of something...so I checked out the site. I thought you'd grown out of that.

John Dashwood
24 March 2011
In many ways I have. Though I must point out that many aspects of it do make some valid points/
Liberalism say anything goes. I disagree with that.
Conservatism is not longer conservatism.
So I don't have anything to do with it either.

John Dashwood
24 March 2011
Well considering that many of those locations mentioned in your "evidence" have some of the lowest crime in the country compared to more "Liberal" areas like say L.A. for instance and it's home state with all it's brownouts. I figured something equally sweeping and judgemental was in order. Last I checked. Liberals didn't care about teenage pregnancy, sanctity of marriage, the middle class, education, or a balanced budget. But handouts to people who don't go out and earn it. Also they're all for rights for criminals to sue people defending themselves from them and not deporting illegal aliens, but going after ranchers defending their property. "Conservatives" are only concerned with America's elite and that sums them up. You forget I spent some of my youth growing up in the most liberal state on the east coast. I saw it's decaying affects on society. Like not having the right to defend a family member getting attack but had the right to call the police. For if i attacked their attacker i could get sued. Also the affects on the budget of the currant president are from the previous president. So Clinton had nothing to do with a balanced budget. But the President before him. Love him or not it's the truth. See so i do read everything I don't just glance through it and deside because of it's origins it must be wrong. I read everything from all world leaders of all ideologies. I always have.

John Dashwood
24 March 2011
Remember, in politics your enemy may turn out to be the one that's right after all.
Also Communism with all it's Gulags (in use well on up into 1989 by the way in Russia) that killed and estimated 300 million people and still counting (North Korea and China). Is liberalism at it's finest. Many people forget that. Many Americans get confused as to why Communism and Fascism were at odds. Why? Ideology. Fascism is the Right and Communism is the Left. They hated each other even though their methods were astonishingly similiar strictly because one was Conservatism and one was Liberalism.

Martin Cox
24 March 2011
I could go through, pointing out how the communism of the USSR and China are NOT, in fact, communism, but fascism and denial of individual rights, but I'm going to go ahead and call it. You've obviously not grown out of the racist perceptions you had a while back so there's no point in going down the line with it. It's like debating a creationist at this point.
(Note: he had previously "liked" an image I posted regarding creationists that said, "Debating a creationist is like playing chess with a pigeon: No matter how well you do, the pigeon is going to knock over the pieces, shit on the board, and strut around like he's the winner.")

John Dashwood
26 March 2011
No Fascism and Communism are two very different animals. Obviously you learned your political leanings of the moment from what ever chick you're currently sleeping with. Seeing as how you have never been known to have any other opinion than what the female gender has dictated to you. Fascism for your information and enlightenment makes the people of the nation the bottom line. It is an economical method where the gross national product is made the standard on which the currency is valued instead of gold. The more people work and produce the more valuable the currency becomes. Instead of borrowing loans from other countries and incurring dept (Like our country, HELLO!). Fascist countries fall back on the bartering system with other nations. Thus Fascist Italy withstood the Great depression and National Socialist Germany rebounded in short order under such a system. It worked so well FDR copied aspects of it in his "New Deal". That's why Fascist governments still have private ownership of property and businesses and Communist don't. Fascism get's it name from the Fasces, an ancient Roman symbol of unity. So to call all oppressive governments Fascist is pure ignorance. Communism seeks to make a classless, so called common ownership society where there is no private property and the taking of private property from people to create it. If you could go through and point out anything you would have. But like most people holding onto liberal ideology you can't debate anything. Why is that? Because arrogance aside all liberals can do is make snide accusations and say such things are not worth debating blah blah blah. Because they are hyper conscious they have nothing to say. Or well at least nothing but the usual song and dance. Which all you have said I have heard before. It's called: Secular Fundamentalism. It's astoundingly intolerant to for a segment of society that fancy's itself the epitome of enlightenment and sophistication.

Martin Cox
26 March 2011
Well you definitely lost all credibility with the words "sanctity of marriage" and now you've gone to personal insults. I guess that about does it, doesn't it?
I refuse to debate this tripe because you've swallowed it, hook, line, and sinker. It's like debating a creationist because you accept certain things as basically true when they aren't. I refuse to debate it because you haven't said one thing that was based on evidence, besides the origin of word forms, which have nothing to do with this shit. Learn something from somewhere besides your racist websites and you might have some ground to stand on. Maybe. Not likely.
You've also swallowed some shit about me, apparently. I do not base my own thoughts on those of anyone else except as new data with which to compare my own. I then go and get evidence to support that data. I am a scientist and a learner. But you never knew that.
It's obvious that you never knew me, man. That's one of the worst parts about this. I thought you at least would have observed me enough to know at least a little more than this moronic bullshit. You're too much like your brother, I suppose. He seems to think that my life is nothing but a series of fuck sessions. I've grown to despise him for so much for all he's done to me and all he's said about me, while I was a friend to his sorry ass and kept him out of so much trouble I can't even list the incidents. And now I despise you for your lack of ability to think outside your own fucking box and trying to say that you know me with this crap.

Don't you ever call me

Martin Cox
26 March 2011

On a final note, if you ever try to call me or contact me again, you're showing your true nature to be a pathetic last-word seeker and just a rotten, nasty little pissant, yourself. See I DO pay attention to the people I claim to be friends and who I am trying to help. As a result of this knowledge about you, and from experience I have gained about people you claim to call your friends and your behavior about them, I expect you to bad-mouth me to everyone. I actually already don't doubt that you do, considering what you've said here. That's fine, since no one in their right might listens to you with any seriousness, anyway.

Good luck with that shit.

Tags: , , ,

*Snicker-Snack!*